Isolated and Remote Work
This page provides guidance about risk managing isolated and remote work.
What is Isolated and Remote Work?
Isolated and remote work is work that separates a worker or group of workers from other people that makes it problematic and more difficult to receive help due to the location, time, or nature of work.
An example of isolated and remote workers can include:
- all-night convenience store and service station attendants
- sales representatives, including real estate agents
- long-distance freight transport drivers
- agricultural workers, scientists, park rangers, bus drivers and others doing field work alone
- health and community workers working with members of the public but isolated from their colleagues.
Management of WHS Duties:
The risk of injury or illness from isolated and remote work should be managed in the same way as any other physical or psychosocial hazard.
Step 1 – Identify the hazards:
The risk management process begins with the person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) identifying all reasonably foreseeable hazards at their workplace. For psychosocial hazards, this means systematically working through each of the 12 common psychosocial hazards to identify situations where those hazards could occur. The PCBU needs to think about foreseeable situations or factors within the design or management of work, including unexpected events which may occur and potentially cause injury or illness in the workplace.
The following table provides some example questions to assist in identifying potential hazards in the workplace:
Situation | Examples |
|---|---|
Are workers ever rostered to open or close the business by themselves? |
|
Are workers ever required to open or close the business on short notice? |
|
Are workers ever alone, even for a short time? |
|
Are workers ever outside of ear shot (audible range) or eye shot (visual range) of other workers? |
|
Are workers ever required to travel for work, or work in an isolated geographical area? |
|
Step 2 – Assess the risks:
The PCBU needs to consider what harm could happen to their workers for each of the identified hazards. When assessing the risks, they also need to think about how likely the harm is to occur (likelihood) and how severe the harm could be (consequences).
The PCBU should consider all available information, including their business and the type of work, their workers, any nearby businesses and their type of work, and the known industry risks. Psychosocial hazards can result in both psychological and physical injuries and illnesses and the PCBU needs to consider both as potential harm outcomes.
The following table provides a basic risk assessment for the following identified situation ‘Workers are rostered to open and close the business by themselves each working day. This is part of normal weekly rostering.’
Considerations | Psychological impact | Physical impact |
|---|---|---|
The business hours are 07:00am – 6:00pm, and the workers are alone from 07:00am – 08:00am, and 5:00pm – 6:00pm. | While alone, the worker could be exposed to several harmful work-related behaviours from customers including:
Harmful work-related behaviours can have both a physical and psychological impact on exposed workers. | |
Most of the surrounding businesses do not open until 08:00am. Two businesses were identified as opening at 7:30am. | The worker may experience increased work-related stress from the unknowns associated with being alone without readily accessible help. | There are less people around to physically assist the worker in an emergency, such as a fire, robbery, or medical emergency. |
One of the nearby businesses is licensed to serve alcohol, and there are often intoxicated persons sharing the outside area/carpark of an afternoon. | Alcohol can reduce inhibitions and lead to behaviour that is out of character. It is more likely that an intoxicated person will become suddenly aggressive or violent. Harmful work-related behaviours can have both a physical and psychological impact on exposed workers. | |
Some of the workers are vulnerable workers aged less than 25 years. | The worker may experience increased work-related stress as they may not possess the maturity and experience to effectively manage customer-related conflict on their own. | It is more likely that a harmful situation will escalate when the worker does not have the knowledge or experience to de-escalate the conflict. The escalation could increase the severity of harm. |
One of the nearby businesses has been robbed on multiple occasions in the past two years. | The worker could be exposed to harmful work-related behaviours from persons committing crimes. | It is more likely that a worker will be exposed to harmful work-related behaviours if there are repeated incidents occurring nearby. |
The business incident records indicate that most hazardous manual task injuries have occurred during opening and closing. | The worker may experience increased work-related stress from feeling pressured to handle excessive loads alone to complete the shift requirements. | The worker could receive a work-related musculoskeletal injury or disease through strenuous activity or unexpected movements – for example, handling a load that shifts position. |
On speaking with the workers, they have advised that they feel uncomfortable working alone because they can’t tell when a customer enters the store when they are out the back. | The worker could be caught off guard by a customer, who could approach them from behind without warning. Harmful work-related behaviours can have both a physical and psychological impact on exposed workers. | |
Step 3 – Control the risks:
The PCBU must eliminate risks to health and safety so far as is reasonably practicable.
If it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate the risks, the PCBU must minimise the risks so far as is reasonably practicable using the Hierarchy of Controls.
It may not be possible for the PCBU to have two or more workers opening or closing the business every day, but they may be able to implement other controls to minimise harm to their workers.
The following table provides an example of how PCBUs can use the hierarchy of controls to minimise the risks in your workplace:
Hierarchy of Control | Control Measures |
|---|---|
Substitute (wholly or partly) the hazard giving risk to the risk with something that gives rise to a lesser risk. | Roster on two or more workers for opening and closing shifts where possible. |
Isolate the hazard from any person exposed to it. | Installation of a service window that excludes customers from entering the store during certain hours. |
Implement engineering controls. | Purchasing of trolley jacks and other hazardous manual task aids to reduce ergonomic injuries. |
Installation of monitored security cameras. | |
Installation of a door chime that alerts workers when a customer enters the store. | |
Implement administrative controls. | Installation of signage indicating aggression will not be tolerated. |
Developing a working relationship and direct contact channels with nearby businesses that can provide practical support in an emergency. | |
Organising formal de-escalation training for workers opening and closing the business. | |
Re-designing work to ensure hazardous manual tasks are not occurring during opening and closing shifts. | |
Allowing isolated workers to lock the door between customers to reduce customers entering undetected. | |
Developing a check-in process where isolated workers receive regular ongoing contact from their supervisor at scheduled times. | |
Provision and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) | Purchase of uniforms and equipment specific to the tasks that give rise to the risk (for example, stainless steel chain mesh gloves, aprons, and non-slip shoes for hospitality workers). |
Step 4 – Review the control measures:
Finally, the PCBU must review the control measures regularly to ensure they remain effective and are maintained (being used or followed) in the workplace.
At a minimum, a review is required in the following circumstances:
- the control measure does not control the risk it was implemented to control so far as is reasonably practicable,
- before a change at the workplace that is likely to give rise to a new or different risk to health or safety that the measure may not effectively control,
- a new relevant hazard or risk is identified,
- the results of consultation by the duty holder under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (WHS Act) or Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (WHS Regulation) indicate that a review is necessary,
- a health and safety representative requests a review in certain circumstances outlined in Section 38 of the WHS Regulation.
More information
- Psychosocial hazards - WorkSafe ACT
- Managing psychosocial hazards - WorkSafe ACT
- Psychosocial risk management scenario - WorkSafe ACT
Resources
On this page
